28.7 C
Singapore
Sunday, May 19, 2024
spot_img

PeruPortDispute Escalates as COSCO Insists on Original Terms

Must read

By Marco Aquino

LIMA, May 7 (Reuters)–The Chinesestate-ownedcompany at the center of a dispute over operations of amegaportit is building on Peru’s Pacific coast insisted on Tuesday on terms agreed with the government, as some local officials havesought to backtrack on the deal.

Hong Kong-based CoscoShippingPorts will defend its legal rights to provide servicesas the exclusive operator of the deepwaterChancayPortTerminal under “terms that were agreed at the beginning of this investment,” the firm said in a statement.

Cosco added that the legal controversy has harmed the project and cautioned against imposing new rules on ports that some regulators have said they might consider.

Peru’s government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cosco began developing Chancayportin 2019as a hub in the South American Pacific and key growth driver for Peru.In 2021, Peru’s NationalPortAuthority (APN) awarded Cosco the exclusive right to run Chancay, but said in March that it never had the legal authority to grant it. It blamed an “administrative error” and requested that a judge void the terms.

Cosco responded at the time that it was evaluating the impact of the decision. Since then, Peruvian lawmakers have pushed to allow for the exclusive provision ofportservices by private companiesand Economy Minister Jose Arista has said the originalportdeal should be respected.

Cosco, which provides marine transportation services,is expected to invest some $1.3 billion on the first stage of the$3.5 billionproject, with more than 70% of construction completed.

Last month, Coscosenta letter to Peru’s economy ministry requesting a six-month negotiation to amicably resolve the dispute without resorting to international arbitration, which Arista said had been received.

At the time, he said he expected toreach a dealand avoid arbitration.

In its statement on Tuesday, Cosco noted that the ministry had yet to respond to its letter, proposing an “institutional channel” for talks. But it also said it has taken a first step toward invoking an arbitration process allowed for by a Chinese-Peruvian trade pact.

(Reporting by Marco Aquino; Writing by David Alire Garcia; Editing by Richard Chang)

spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article

spot_img